[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130801152356.GW9858@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:23:56 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.de,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: core: init delayed_work for codec-codec links
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:13:52PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:25:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Why is this better than pointing at the normal work that you'd expect to
> > be used there?
> By 'normal work' do you mean the close_delayed_work() used for
> standard PCM DAIs?
Yes - making up this empty work doesn't seem like a robust approach.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists