lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130801190556.GA1495@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:05:56 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ARM ATTEND] catching up on exploit
 mitigations

On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 12:13:22PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
 > I was just reading http://faultlinux.lip6.fr/ which says that in
 > 2011 the static checker fault rate in arch/ and fs/ was worse than
 > in drivers/

I've been working on getting more regular builds in coverity, so we can
get more meaningful statistics on things like "what area is getting worse".

Of the current bugs I've categorised so far, here's the breakdown for 3.11-rc3
in terms of highest bug counts.

Drivers/net/wireless: 659 
Drivers/ [1] : 600
Drivers/staging: 449
Drivers/scsi: 409
Drivers/net: 350
Net/[2] : 297
Drivers/media: 286
Sound: 220
Drivers/GPU: 217

That's the top categories for the whole kernel.

That wireless was top of the list was the least shocking thing to me,
based on what we get reported to Fedora bugzilla.  That it found more
bugs there than in staging was amusing though. The good news is that
wireless also takes the top slot for 'resolved' issues.

The paper above talks about 'arch' but doesn't indicate if it's counting
all arches, or just the one they run the tests on. (Coverity only covers x86,
so arch/ shows up in 10th place there).
FS doesn't show up on the list until 14th place, where there's a another
catchall category like [1][2]. The first actual fs category with the most
bugs is btrfs at 16th place, with 68 outstanding reports.

There's a lot of work to do picking through their database, including writing
modelling functions to reduce false positives. But, I'm on it.
I'll write up something a bit more in-depth later.

	Dave

[1] This is everything that doesn't match one of the more specific drivers category, 
    of which there's those mentioned above, plus about a dozen others.
[2] This is everything in net/ except for ipv4/ipv6/sctp, so all the weirdo protocols basically.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ