linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] exec: introduce exec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130801190511.GA3213@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 1 Aug 2013 21:05:11 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Zach Levis <zml@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] exec: introduce exec_binprm() for "depth == 0" code

task_pid_nr_ns() and trace/ptrace code in the middle of the
recursive search_binary_handler() looks confusing and imho
annoying. We only need this code if "depth == 0", lets add
a simple helper which calls search_binary_handler() and does
trace_sched_process_exec() + ptrace_event().

The patch also moves the setting of task->did_exec, we need
to do this only once.

Note: we can kill either task->did_exec or PF_FORKNOEXEC.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
 fs/exec.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 9c73def..a9ae4f2 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1373,7 +1373,6 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	unsigned int depth = bprm->recursion_depth;
 	int try,retval;
 	struct linux_binfmt *fmt;
-	pid_t old_pid, old_vpid;
 
 	/* This allows 4 levels of binfmt rewrites before failing hard. */
 	if (depth > 5)
@@ -1387,12 +1386,6 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	if (retval)
 		return retval;
 
-	/* Need to fetch pid before load_binary changes it */
-	old_pid = current->pid;
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	old_vpid = task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(current->parent));
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-
 	retval = -ENOENT;
 	for (try=0; try<2; try++) {
 		read_lock(&binfmt_lock);
@@ -1407,16 +1400,11 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 			retval = fn(bprm);
 			bprm->recursion_depth = depth;
 			if (retval >= 0) {
-				if (depth == 0) {
-					trace_sched_process_exec(current, old_pid, bprm);
-					ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC, old_vpid);
-				}
 				put_binfmt(fmt);
 				allow_write_access(bprm->file);
 				if (bprm->file)
 					fput(bprm->file);
 				bprm->file = NULL;
-				current->did_exec = 1;
 				proc_exec_connector(current);
 				return retval;
 			}
@@ -1450,9 +1438,29 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	}
 	return retval;
 }
-
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(search_binary_handler);
 
+static int exec_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
+{
+	pid_t old_pid, old_vpid;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Need to fetch pid before load_binary changes it */
+	old_pid = current->pid;
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	old_vpid = task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(current->parent));
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	ret = search_binary_handler(bprm);
+	if (ret >= 0) {
+		trace_sched_process_exec(current, old_pid, bprm);
+		ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC, old_vpid);
+		current->did_exec = 1;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * sys_execve() executes a new program.
  */
@@ -1541,7 +1549,7 @@ static int do_execve_common(const char *filename,
 	if (retval < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	retval = search_binary_handler(bprm);
+	retval = exec_binprm(bprm);
 	if (retval < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-- 
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/