[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130801215924.GO715@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 17:59:24 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
azurIt <azurit@...ox.sk>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/6] arch: mm: do not invoke OOM killer on kernel fault
OOM
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:58:05PM -0400, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> (7/25/13 6:25 PM), Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Kernel faults are expected to handle OOM conditions gracefully (gup,
> > uaccess etc.), so they should never invoke the OOM killer. Reserve
> > this for faults triggered in user context when it is the only option.
> >
> > Most architectures already do this, fix up the remaining few.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
>
> OK. but now almost all arch have the same page fault handler. So, I think
> we can implement arch generic page fault handler in future. Ah, ok, never
> mind if you are not interest.
Well, I'm already working towards it ;-) Still a long way to go,
though to fully replace them with generic code...
> Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists