linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v2] sched,x86: optimize switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzsUhBU2S_GmwYicttnf5MM1Z723xZ9UgYCi5kr8psYEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2013 19:25:27 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	jmario@...hat.com, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, dzickus@...hat.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] sched,x86: optimize switch_mm for multi-threaded workloads

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Is this better?  Not that I really care which version gets applied :)

I'm ok with this.

That said, I'm assuming this goes in through Ingo, since it is both
x86 and scheduler-related. I can take it directly, but see no real
reason to. Ingo?

Talking about x86-specific - I'm assuming other architectures have
similar patterns?

               Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/