[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51FB35CD.7040709@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 12:30:05 +0800
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: video: fix reversed indexed BQC
On 08/02/2013 12:11 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 08/02/2013 07:34 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>> Commit 1a7c618 (ACPI video: support _BQC/_BCL/_BCM methods that use
>>> index values) assumed that bl->levels were not reverted, but at this
>>> point they already are, so there's no need to revert them yet again.
>>
>> When acpi_video_bqc_value_to_level is called, bl->levels is not
>> reverted.
>
> This is the code that turns br->flags._BCL_reversed on:
>
> if (max_level == br->levels[2]) {
> br->flags._BCL_reversed = 1;
> sort(&br->levels[2], count - 2, sizeof(br->levels[2]),
> acpi_video_cmp_level, NULL);
> }
>
> Now tell me how br->flags._BCL_reversed can be on, and the br->levels
> *not* reverted.
Oh yes, it is reverted to be in increase order, so it is not in reverse
order. I'm a little confused by these words.
Please see acpi_video_bqc_quirk, we set _BQC_use_index by revert the
level on a reversed _BCL, so we will need to revert level here too.
-Aaron
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists