[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-8f898fbbe5ee5e20a77c4074472a1fd088dc47d1@git.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:07:25 -0700
From: tip-bot for Rik van Riel <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, pjt@...gle.com, jmario@...hat.com,
riel@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, dzickus@...hat.com
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/x86: Optimize switch_mm()
for multi-threaded workloads
Commit-ID: 8f898fbbe5ee5e20a77c4074472a1fd088dc47d1
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/8f898fbbe5ee5e20a77c4074472a1fd088dc47d1
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:14:21 -0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:10:26 +0200
sched/x86: Optimize switch_mm() for multi-threaded workloads
Dick Fowles, Don Zickus and Joe Mario have been working on
improvements to perf, and noticed heavy cache line contention
on the mm_cpumask, running linpack on a 60 core / 120 thread
system.
The cause turned out to be unnecessary atomic accesses to the
mm_cpumask. When in lazy TLB mode, the CPU is only removed from
the mm_cpumask if there is a TLB flush event.
Most of the time, no such TLB flush happens, and the kernel
skips the TLB reload. It can also skip the atomic memory
set & test.
Here is a summary of Joe's test results:
* The __schedule function dropped from 24% of all program cycles down
to 5.5%.
* The cacheline contention/hotness for accesses to that bitmask went
from being the 1st/2nd hottest - down to the 84th hottest (0.3% of
all shared misses which is now quite cold)
* The average load latency for the bit-test-n-set instruction in
__schedule dropped from 10k-15k cycles down to an average of 600 cycles.
* The linpack program results improved from 133 GFlops to 144 GFlops.
Peak GFlops rose from 133 to 153.
Reported-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130731221421.616d3d20@annuminas.surriel.com
[ Made the comments consistent around the modified code. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 20 +++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index cdbf367..be12c53 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -45,22 +45,28 @@ static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
/* Re-load page tables */
load_cr3(next->pgd);
- /* stop flush ipis for the previous mm */
+ /* Stop flush ipis for the previous mm */
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev));
- /*
- * load the LDT, if the LDT is different:
- */
+ /* Load the LDT, if the LDT is different: */
if (unlikely(prev->context.ldt != next->context.ldt))
load_LDT_nolock(&next->context);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- else {
+ else {
this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.state, TLBSTATE_OK);
BUG_ON(this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm) != next);
- if (!cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next))) {
- /* We were in lazy tlb mode and leave_mm disabled
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next))) {
+ /*
+ * On established mms, the mm_cpumask is only changed
+ * from irq context, from ptep_clear_flush() while in
+ * lazy tlb mode, and here. Irqs are blocked during
+ * schedule, protecting us from simultaneous changes.
+ */
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
+ /*
+ * We were in lazy tlb mode and leave_mm disabled
* tlb flush IPI delivery. We must reload CR3
* to make sure to use no freed page tables.
*/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists