[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51FB7DF5.8030600@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 17:37:57 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: <gaoyang.zyh@...bao.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: stable: a59f4e079d19464eebb9b06513a1d4f55fdae5ba needs backport ?
commit a59f4e079d19464eebb9b06513a1d4f55fdae5ba
Author: Zhu Yanhai <gaoyang.zyh@...bao.com>
Date: Tue Jan 8 12:56:52 2013 +0800
sched: Fix the broken sched_rr_get_interval()
Without this patch, syscall sched_rr_get_interval() can return wrong
value, and the bug was introduced in 2.6.24, so this looks like a
candidate for stable kernel.
The concern for backporting is that this might break some userspace
programs? As the changelog says:
[ Since this is an ABI and an old bug, we'll test this via a
slow upstream route, to hopefully discover any app breakage. ]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists