[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130802095406.GB30072@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 12:54:06 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
jeremy@...p.org, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, hpa@...or.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
peterz@...radead.org, mtosatti@...hat.com,
stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
attilio.rao@...rix.com, ouyang@...pitt.edu, gregkh@...e.de,
agraf@...e.de, chegu_vinod@...com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
avi.kivity@...il.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, riel@...hat.com, drjones@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V11 15/18] kvm : Paravirtual ticketlocks support for
linux guests running on KVM hypervisor
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 11:25:39AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Ingo,
> >
> > Do you have any concerns reg this series? please let me know if this
> > looks good now to you.
>
> I'm inclined to NAK it for excessive quotation - who knows how many people
> left the discussion in disgust? Was it done to drive away as many
> reviewers as possible?
>
> Anyway, see my other reply, the measurement results seem hard to interpret
> and inconclusive at the moment.
>
That result was only for patch 18 of the series, not pvspinlock in
general.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists