[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51FB0C95.8040207@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:34:13 +0800
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
CC: rjw@...k.pl, lenb@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org,
trenn@...e.de, yinghai@...nel.org, jiang.liu@...wei.com,
wency@...fujitsu.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com,
mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org, mina86@...a86.com,
gong.chen@...ux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com,
lwoodman@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, jweiner@...hat.com,
prarit@...hat.com, zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com,
yanghy@...fujitsu.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/18] acpi: Introduce acpi_invalid_table() to check
if a table is invalid.
On 08/02/2013 06:26 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
......
>> +int __init acpi_invalid_table(struct cpio_data *file,
>> + const char *path, const char *signature)
>
> Since this function verifies a given acpi table in initrd (not that the
> table is invalid), I'd suggest to rename it something like
> acpi_verify_initrd(). Otherwise, it looks good to me.
>
Hi Toshi-san,
Thanks, will change the name.
Thanks.
> Acked-by: Toshi Kani<toshi.kani@...com>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists