linux-kernel - [ 79/99] drm/i915: correctly restore fences with objects attached

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130802100236.971733989@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri,  2 Aug 2013 18:08:32 +0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
	Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@...omium.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
	Björn Bidar <theodorstormgrade@...il.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: [ 79/99] drm/i915: correctly restore fences with objects attached

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>

commit 94a335dba34ff47cad3d6d0c29b452d43a1be3c8 upstream.

To avoid stalls we delay tiling changes and especially hold of
committing the new fence state for as long as possible.
Synchronization points are in the execbuf code and in our gtt fault
handler.

Unfortunately we've missed that tricky detail when adding proper fence
restore code in

commit 19b2dbde5732170a03bd82cc8bd442cf88d856f7
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Wed Jun 12 10:15:12 2013 +0100

    drm/i915: Restore fences after resume and GPU resets

The result was that we've restored fences for objects with no tiling,
since the object<->fence link still existed after resume. Now that
wouldn't have been too bad since any subsequent access would have
fixed things up, but if we've changed from tiled to untiled real havoc
happened:

The tiling stride is stored -1 in the fence register, so a stride of 0
resulted in all 1s in the top 32bits, and so a completely bogus fence
spanning everything from the start of the object to the top of the
GTT. The tell-tale in the register dumps looks like:

                 FENCE START 2: 0x0214d001
                 FENCE END 2: 0xfffff3ff

Bit 11 isn't set since the hw doesn't store it, even when writing all
1s (at least on my snb here).

To prevent such a gaffle in the future add a sanity check for fences
with an untiled object attached in i915_gem_write_fence.

v2: Fix the WARN, spotted by Chris.

v3: Trying to reuse get_fences looked ugly and obfuscated the code.
Instead reuse update_fence and to make it really dtrt also move the
fence dirty state clearing into update_fence.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60530
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
Tested-by: Björn Bidar <theodorstormgrade@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2138,7 +2138,17 @@ void i915_gem_restore_fences(struct drm_
 
 	for (i = 0; i < dev_priv->num_fence_regs; i++) {
 		struct drm_i915_fence_reg *reg = &dev_priv->fence_regs[i];
-		i915_gem_write_fence(dev, i, reg->obj);
+
+		/*
+		 * Commit delayed tiling changes if we have an object still
+		 * attached to the fence, otherwise just clear the fence.
+		 */
+		if (reg->obj) {
+			i915_gem_object_update_fence(reg->obj, reg,
+						     reg->obj->tiling_mode);
+		} else {
+			i915_gem_write_fence(dev, i, NULL);
+		}
 	}
 }
 
@@ -2676,6 +2686,10 @@ static void i915_gem_write_fence(struct
 	if (i915_gem_object_needs_mb(dev_priv->fence_regs[reg].obj))
 		mb();
 
+	WARN(obj && (!obj->stride || !obj->tiling_mode),
+	     "bogus fence setup with stride: 0x%x, tiling mode: %i\n",
+	     obj->stride, obj->tiling_mode);
+
 	switch (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen) {
 	case 7:
 	case 6:
@@ -2735,6 +2749,7 @@ static void i915_gem_object_update_fence
 		fence->obj = NULL;
 		list_del_init(&fence->lru_list);
 	}
+	obj->fence_dirty = false;
 }
 
 static int
@@ -2864,7 +2879,6 @@ i915_gem_object_get_fence(struct drm_i91
 		return 0;
 
 	i915_gem_object_update_fence(obj, reg, enable);
-	obj->fence_dirty = false;
 
 	return 0;
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/