[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACmBeS1vT6HyhN=Q4Y9izR0F1Es818iU0fQ5-U8LxijRKe=+8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 14:28:28 +0200
From: Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arm@...nel.org, vinod.koul@...el.com, djbw@...com,
linux@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dmaengine: Add MOXA ART DMA engine driver
Hi Arnd,
Thanks for the replies. I think what you mention should now be fixed.
Except one thing where I still have questions:
On 29 July 2013 18:35, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> You must not override the "dest_req_no" and "dest_req_no" in moxart_slave_config
> since they are already set by the ->xlate() function and the driver calling
> slave_config generally has no knowledge of what the slave id is.
MMC now has a device tree node:
mmc: mmc@...00000 {
compatible = "moxa,moxart-mmc";
reg = <0x98e00000 0x5C>;
interrupts = <5 0>;
clocks = <&coreclk>;
dmas = <&dma 0>,
<&dma 1>;
dma-names = "tx", "rx";
};
.. where the driver requests channel 0-1 and sets cfg.slave_id =
APB_DMA_SD_REQ_NO for both.
Perhaps this is not how slave_id is intended to be used?
Maybe it would be more appropriate to have two DMA cells?
APB_DMA_SD_REQ_NO can then be moved from driver code to DT.
Best regards,
Jonas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists