linux-kernel - Re: [Update][PATCH] cpufreq: Do not hold driver module references for additional policy CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpo=KhzFiiihCPfZ9kAm4rx1ZUfgWDJPQkhCgM5u2Gj3+uA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 2 Aug 2013 20:08:56 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Update][PATCH] cpufreq: Do not hold driver module references for
 additional policy CPUs

On 2 August 2013 19:01, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> Care to add a changelog?
>
> I'll apply this on top of my $subject patch, then.

I thought you will merge this one with your patch, but there is no
harm in getting one more on my name :)

Changelog is (patch attached):

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 16:17:33 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Pass policy to cpufreq_add_policy_cpu()

Caller of cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() already has pointer to policy structure and
so there is no need to find it again in cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(). Lets pass it
directly.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 18 ++++++------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Download attachment "0001-cpufreq-Pass-policy-to-cpufreq_add_policy_cpu.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (2651 bytes)