[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130802.145041.845804796107623114.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 14:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: amwang@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dborkman@...hat.com, joe@...ches.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 1/8] net: introduce generic union inet_addr
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:14:27 +0800
> From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
>
> Introduce a generic IP address type, union inet_addr, so that
> subsystems don't have to use their own definitions. Because
> netpoll already defines union inet_addr, just move it to global.
> Some of the helper functions will be used by VXLAN IPv6 code too.
>
> This patch also reuses the "%pIS" specifier, to make it accept
> union inet_addr instead of struct sockaddr.
>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Changing %pIS to %pIA is pure churn, and of zero value that I can see.
Every time I review this patch set I discover some new thing that I'm
very disappointed with.
You're going to have to stop being so ambitious, and start very small.
Maybe one tiny patch at a time if needed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists