[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130802.145146.215059840395396296.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 14:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: pmoore@...hat.com
Cc: amwang@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
james.l.morris@...cle.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov,
eparis@...isplace.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 8/8] selinux: use generic union inet_addr
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:34:07 -0400
> On Friday, August 02, 2013 03:14:34 PM Cong Wang wrote:
>> From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
>>
>> selinux has some similar definition like union inet_addr,
>> it can re-use the generic union inet_addr too.
>>
>> Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
>> Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
>> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
>> Cc: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
>
> Perhaps I'm confusing this with another patch but I though DaveM said he
> wasn't going to merge these patches?
I didn't like how he added completely unused bloat to various
datastructures because he unconditionally put a port field into
there.
He removed that problem this time, but there are still a lot of
things I don't like about this patch series.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists