linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v01 0/3] Power Capping Framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1375482806.2034.140.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:33:26 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v01 0/3] Power Capping Framework

On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 06:30 +0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 11:08:49AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> > Once this framework is approved, we will submit a RAPL client driver using this
> > framework.
> 
> Also, given that you work with a lot of kernel developers, I would like
> to see their review and signed-off-by: on these patches before you
> resend them, please.  That way I know that they agree with this
> framework as a way for their future changes in this area.

Before is a bit hard on public mailing lists isn't it?

Shouldn't the reviewed-by/acked-by/signed-off-by's be
done after a real patch is submitted?

This is just an RFC patchset.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/