[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130802235941.8392AE0090@blue.fi.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 02:59:41 +0300 (EEST)
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add per-process flag to control thp
Alex Thorlton wrote:
> > What kind of workloads are you talking about?
>
> Our benchmarking team has a list of several of the SPEC OMP benchmarks
> that perform significantly better when THP is disabled. I tried to get
> the list but one of our servers is acting up and I can't get to it
> right now :/
Have you track down the reason why it's slow tih THP?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists