linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] CPUFreq: Fixes & Cleanups for 3.12

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3427557.z5AT4sQqPo@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Sun, 04 Aug 2013 00:02:16 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	l.majewski@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] CPUFreq: Fixes & Cleanups for 3.12

On Saturday, August 03, 2013 06:58:35 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 3 August 2013 17:37, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 03, 2013 05:19:18 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> Hi Rafael,
> >>
> >> This patchset tries to fix & cleanup many existing cpufreq core issues. First
> >> four patches tries to cleanup basic problems in cpufreq core. Its first patch
> >> was earlier sent separately but now is part of this series.
> >>
> >> Fifth patch was also sent earlier as reply to your patches and was reviewed by
> >> Srivatsa. Sixth patch was picked from Lukasz's patchset on introducing software
> >> "boost" feature in core. It will be used by this patchset.
> >>
> >> And last four are the most significant part of this set. They try to make many
> >> things simple and robust.
> >>
> >> This is rebased of your bleeding-edge branch + two patches from you:
> >> 18a6b03 cpufreq: Avoid double kobject_put() for the same kobject in error code path
> >> d0cde63 cpufreq: Do not hold driver module references for additional policy CPUs
> >> abe513f Merge branch 'acpi-sleep-next' into linux-next
> >>
> >> They are also pushed in my cpufreq-next branch
> >
> > How much testing has that received so far?
> 
> I planned to add this information but forgot at the last moment. It
> was partially
> tested. As it was mostly developed over the weekend I wasn't able to do much
> of testing. I posted it to get early comments, and testing would complete by
> beginning of next week.

OK, thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/