linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v01 1/3] PowerCap: Documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1375489541.2034.151.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Fri, 02 Aug 2013 17:25:41 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v01 1/3] PowerCap: Documentation

On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 17:23 -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> On 08/02/2013 05:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 11:08 -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> >> Added power cap framework documentation. This explains the use of power capping framework,
> >> sys-fs and programming interface.
> > []
> Didn't understand this comment.

Not a comment, just notation showing skipping a bunch
context.

> > Given that the ranges seem to be u64s, perhaps the
> > lower bounds are too high.  Why not nano/pico/fempto
> > watts/joules/seconds?
> I think they are too small to realistically set a limits on power or 
> measure. Let's see what others think.

No rush.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/