[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51FF51EB.9070907@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:19:07 +0800
From: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
Feng Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>,
Sucheta Chakraborty <sucheta.chakraborty@...gic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Refactor msi/msix restore code Part2
On 2013-08-02 20:01, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>>> Konrad, are you OK with this patch now?
>>> Yes, I wanted to make sure that the existing behavior under baremetal
>>> was not altered.
>>>
>>> And Duan had confirmed it was not - thought to be on a safe side it
>>> would be good to confirm this via testing just in case.
>> I had ever let our customer test on baremetal and it passed.
> Are they OK with being credited for this in the patch? Meaning are they
> OK with Reported-by-and-Tested-by: flag?
sucheta.chakraborty from Qlogic also reproduced the same and I got his
confirm patch worked.
Already add him in tested-by.
zduan
>
> Either way, I think the only remaining issue is to expand the git commit
> a bit to include the discussion about the flow of the pci_read/pci_write
> and point out that the logic remains the same.
>
>
>> zduan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists