lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 05 Aug 2013 09:33:32 +0800
From:	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	robert.moore@...el.com, lv.zheng@...el.com, lenb@...nel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, trenn@...e.de,
	yinghai@...nel.org, jiang.liu@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
	izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org,
	mina86@...a86.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
	vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com, lwoodman@...hat.com,
	riel@...hat.com, jweiner@...hat.com, prarit@...hat.com,
	zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com, yanghy@...fujitsu.com, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 07/18] x86, ACPI: Also initialize signature
 and length when parsing root table.

Hi Rafael,

On 08/02/2013 09:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, August 02, 2013 05:14:26 PM Tang Chen wrote:
>> Besides the phys addr of the acpi tables, it will be very convenient if
>> we also have the signature of each table in acpi_gbl_root_table_list at
>> early time. We can find SRAT easily by comparing the signature.
>>
>> This patch alse record signature and some other info in
>> acpi_gbl_root_table_list at early time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen<tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yanfei<zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
>
> The subject is misleading, as the change is in ACPICA and therefore affects not
> only x86.

OK, will change it.

>
> Also I think the same comments as for the other ACPICA patch is this series
> applies: You shouldn't modify acpi_tbl_parse_root_table() in ways that would
> require the other OSes using ACPICA to be modified.
>

Thank you for the reminding. Please refer to the attachment.
How do you think of the idea from Zheng ?

Thanks.

Download attachment "Re: [PATCH v2 05_18] x86, acpi: Split acpi_boot_table_init() into two parts..eml" of type "message/rfc822" (14803 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ