[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fvuozerv.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 18:08:04 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...radead.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: perf, tools: Move gtk browser into separate perfgtk executable
Hi,
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 01:23:20 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:16:41AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> If you want fewer dependencies then build with 'make NO_GTK=1'.
>
> Doesn't help the distros. Installing perf and pulling all the graphics
> libraries in is highly annoying, especially in size constrained VM or
> Cloud images. Having a separate binary or at least an ldopen()able
> plugin that can go into a separate package is highly desirable.
I wrote a patch series [1] separating gtk code to a dso and use it with
libdl last year. But I didn't get much feedback probably due to the
mistake of not installing the dso to a proper place. It'd be great if
you guys take a look at it and give some comments.
Thanks,
Namhyung
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/14/510
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists