linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-designware: make *CNT values configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130805100225.GA9694@katana>
Date:	Mon, 5 Aug 2013 12:02:26 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@...lis.com>
Cc:	Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@...ox.com>,
	mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-designware: make *CNT values configurable


> > >Would it make sense to add generic I2C device tree properties for those
> > >parameters? These parameters are independent of the actual bus driver,
> > >rather a PCB property... And as such the correct place would be device
> > >tree or ACPI or similar.
> > 
> > If there are other bus drivers that make use of tr/tf transition
> > times, I think it makes sense.
> 
> Wolfram, what's your opinion on this?

If it is a PCB property, it makes sense to have generic bindings for
it. Can they have very-safe defaults and thus be optional?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)