[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51FFA4B4.5080807@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:12:20 +0200
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
To: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: remove dmacap,memset from Device tree binding
On 08/05/13 14:26, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:53:41AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> I'm not entirely sure on this. The property described is still true for
>> the device, even if the kernel's not using that information now. My
>> feeling would be to keep them, unless there's a plan to better describe
>> the properties of the XOR channels.
>>
>> It shouldn't harm the kernel to have some properties we don't use at
>> this point in time. If we want to reorganise the binding, the first step
>> would be to make the properties as deprecated, rather than removing them
>> outright.
>
> Ok, that matches what I was originally thinking. The bindings are
> supposed to be OS-agnostic, so the fact that we no longer use it is
> irrelevant. The hardware still has the capability.
>
> Sebastian, I'm just going to drop this patch.
Sure, I am fine with dropping it.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists