linux-kernel - Re: i915 INFO: trying to register non-static key.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130805134858.GA6705@sig21.net>
Date:	Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:48:58 +0200
From:	Johannes Stezenbach <js@...21.net>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: i915 INFO: trying to register non-static key.

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:27:29PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:23:53PM +0200, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> > wrt to $Subject, I get this with 3.10.5:
> > 
> > [    4.342638] i915 0000:00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
> > [    4.409045] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> > [    4.409164] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
> > [    4.409278] turning off the locking correctness validator.
> > [    4.409396] CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.10.5 #1
> > [    4.409514] Hardware name: LENOVO 2320CTO/2320CTO, BIOS G2ET82WW (2.02 ) 09/11/2012
> > [    4.409690]  0000000000000001 ffff8802121559e0 ffffffff816b265c ffff880212155a50
> > [    4.410050]  ffffffff8109ba03 ffffffff822cd1c0 0000000000000000 0000000100000006
> > [    4.410408]  0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff8802121587a8
> 
> Looks similar to what I'm seeing. Can you cherry-pick
> 
> commit e1b4d3036c07ff137955fb1c0197ab62534f46ec
> Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@...dawsk.net>
> Date:   Tue Jul 30 16:27:57 2013 -0700
> 
>     drm/i915: fix missed hunk after GT access breakage
> 
> ontop of 3.10-stable?

This is already in 3.10.5 as commit c9af307d38974264922d35c77bb71087d171f8f8.

Thanks,
Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/