[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130805144010.GE31845@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:40:10 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...hat.com>
Cc: edk2-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [edk2] Corrupted EFI region
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:27:44PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> I wouldn't call the design of SetVirtualAddressMap() braindead.
Ok, I've always wondered and you could probably shed some light on the
matter: why is SetVirtualAddressMap() a call-once only? Why can't I
simply call it again and update the mappings?
> I'd rather call kexec unique and somewhat unexpected :)
In all fairness, it was there before UEFI, AFAICT.
> > I wouldn't wonder if we f*cked it up again like the last time. I'll give
> > it a long hard look.
>
> Ah sorry, by "and you guys suspect" I didn't mean to imply anything
> between the lines, I was simply trying to ascertain your working idea :)
As long as we get to the bottom of this, we're all fine. And I'd
pretty much expect everyone who is dealing with EFI to have grown a
sufficiently thick skin before starting to do so, so don't worry.
:-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists