[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51FFBE17.60409@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 11:00:39 -0400
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: acme@...stprotocols.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Runzhen Wang <runzhen@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] perf kvm: debug for missing vmexit/vmentry event
On 8/5/13 2:53 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 08/03/2013 04:05 AM, David Ahern wrote:
>> Expected to have missing events for each vcpu when perf is
>> started. After that should not have missing events.
>
> Sorry, i can not understand what's this info used for.
For debugging. Things that should not happen do seem to happen --
rarely, but it does
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
>> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Runzhen Wang <runzhen@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c b/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c
>> index 28afc05d..41dd25a 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c
>> @@ -568,11 +568,22 @@ static bool handle_kvm_event(struct perf_kvm_stat *kvm,
>> (kvm->trace_vcpu != vcpu_record->vcpu_id))
>> return true;
>>
>> - if (kvm->events_ops->is_begin_event(evsel, sample, &key))
>> + if (kvm->events_ops->is_begin_event(evsel, sample, &key)) {
>> + if (vcpu_record->start_time) {
>> + pr_debug("consecutive begin events (%s) for pid %d, vcpu %d\n",
>> + evsel->name, sample->pid, vcpu_record->vcpu_id);
>> + }
>
> This is not true, the ->start_time is set in handle_begin_event() for the new alloced
> vcpu_record.
>
> If you just want to know the point where is the first event lost, you can track
> it in:
>
> static bool handle_end_event(struct perf_kvm_stat *kvm,
> struct vcpu_event_record *vcpu_record,
> struct event_key *key,
> u64 timestamp)
> {
> ......
>
> /* The begin event is not caught. */
> if (!time_begin) <======
> return true;
>
Ok. I'll drop the patch. I added it for a reason, but can't remember why
at the moment.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists