[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zjswrvaq.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 16:50:37 +0100
From: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: NFS list <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dhowells@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [3.10.4] NFS locking panic, plus persisting NFS shutdown panic from 3.9.*
On 5 Aug 2013, Jeff Layton said:
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:04:27 -0400
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:48:01 +0100
>> Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>> > On 5 Aug 2013, Jeff Layton stated:
>> >
>> > > On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:40:58 +0100
>> > > Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I just got this panic on 3.10.4, in the middle of a large parallel
>> > >> compilation (of Chromium, as it happens) over NFSv3:
>> > >>
>> > >> [16364.527516] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
>> > >> [16364.527571] IP: [<ffffffff81245157>] nlmclnt_setlockargs+0x55/0xcf
>> > >> [16364.527611] PGD 0
>> > >> [16364.527626] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>> > >> [16364.527656] Modules linked in: [last unloaded: microcode]
>> > >> [16364.527690] CPU: 0 PID: 17034 Comm: flock Not tainted 3.10.4-05315-gf4ce424-dirty #1
>> > >> [16364.527730] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/P8H61-MX USB3, BIOS 0506 08/10/2012
>> > >> [16364.527775] task: ffff88041a97ad60 ti: ffff8803501d4000 task.ti: ffff8803501d4000
>> > >> [16364.527813] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81245157>] [<ffffffff81245157>] nlmclnt_setlockargs+0x55/0xcf
>> > >> [16364.527860] RSP: 0018:ffff8803501d5c58 EFLAGS: 00010282
>> > >> [16364.527889] RAX: ffff88041a97ad60 RBX: ffff8803e49c8800 RCX: 0000000000000000
>> > >> [16364.527926] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000004a RDI: ffff8803e49c8b54
>> > >> [16364.527962] RBP: ffff8803501d5c68 R08: 0000000000015720 R09: 0000000000000000
>> > >> [16364.527998] R10: 00007ffffffff000 R11: ffff8803501d5d58 R12: ffff8803501d5d58
>> > >> [16364.528034] R13: ffff88041bd2bc00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8803fc9e2900
>> > >> [16364.528070] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88042fa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> > >> [16364.528111] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> > >> [16364.528142] CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 0000000001c0b000 CR4: 00000000001407f0
>> > >> [16364.528177] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> > >> [16364.528214] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> > >> [16364.528303] Stack:
>> > >> [16364.528316] ffff8803501d5d58 ffff8803e49c8800 ffff8803501d5cd8 ffffffff81245418
>> > >> [16364.528369] 0000000000000000 ffff8803516f0bc0 ffff8803d7b7b6c0 ffffffff81215c81
>> > >> [16364.528418] ffff880300000007 ffff88041bd2bdc8 ffff8801aabe9650 ffff8803fc9e2900
>> > >> [16364.528467] Call Trace:
>> > >> [16364.528485] [<ffffffff81245418>] nlmclnt_proc+0x148/0x5fb
>> > >> [16364.528516] [<ffffffff81215c81>] ? nfs_put_lock_context+0x69/0x6e
>> > >> [16364.528550] [<ffffffff812209a2>] nfs3_proc_lock+0x21/0x23
>> > >> [16364.528581] [<ffffffff812149dd>] do_unlk+0x96/0xb2
>> > >> [16364.528608] [<ffffffff81214b41>] nfs_flock+0x5a/0x71
>> > >> [16364.528637] [<ffffffff8119a747>] locks_remove_flock+0x9e/0x113
>> > >> [16364.528668] [<ffffffff8115cc68>] __fput+0xb6/0x1e6
>> > >> [16364.528695] [<ffffffff8115cda6>] ____fput+0xe/0x10
>> > >> [16364.528724] [<ffffffff810998da>] task_work_run+0x7e/0x98
>> > >> [16364.528754] [<ffffffff81082bc5>] do_exit+0x3cc/0x8fa
>> > >> [16364.528782] [<ffffffff81083501>] ? SyS_wait4+0xa5/0xc2
>> > >> [16364.528811] [<ffffffff8108328d>] do_group_exit+0x6f/0xa2
>> > >> [16364.528843] [<ffffffff810832d7>] SyS_exit_group+0x17/0x17
>> > >> [16364.528876] [<ffffffff81613e92>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>> > >> [16364.528907] Code: 00 00 65 48 8b 04 25 c0 b8 00 00 48 8b 72 20 48 81 ee c0 01 00 00 f3 a4 48 8d bb 54 03 00 00 be 4a 00 00 00 48 8b 90 68 05 00 00 <48> 8b 52 08 48 89 bb d0 00 00 00 48 83 c2 45 48 89 53 38 48 8b
>> > >> [16364.529176] RIP [<ffffffff81245157>] nlmclnt_setlockargs+0x55/0xcf
>> > >> [16364.529264] RSP <ffff8803501d5c58>
>> > >> [16364.529283] CR2: 0000000000000008
>> > >> [16364.539039] ---[ end trace 5a73fddf23441377 ]---
[...]
> The listing and disassembly from nlmclnt_proc is not terribly
> interesting unfortunately. You really want to do the listing and
> disassembly of the RIP at panic time (nlmclnt_setlockargs+0x55).
Oh, sorry! Wrong end of the oops :)
0xffffffff81245157 is in nlmclnt_setlockargs (fs/lockd/clntproc.c:131).
126 struct nlm_args *argp = &req->a_args;
127 struct nlm_lock *lock = &argp->lock;
128
129 nlmclnt_next_cookie(&argp->cookie);
130 memcpy(&lock->fh, NFS_FH(file_inode(fl->fl_file)), sizeof(struct nfs_fh));
131 lock->caller = utsname()->nodename;
132 lock->oh.data = req->a_owner;
133 lock->oh.len = snprintf(req->a_owner, sizeof(req->a_owner), "%u@%s",
134 (unsigned int)fl->fl_u.nfs_fl.owner->pid,
135 utsname()->nodename);
0xffffffff81245102 <+0>: callq 0xffffffff81613b00 <__fentry__>
0xffffffff81245107 <+5>: push %rbp
0xffffffff81245108 <+6>: mov %rsp,%rbp
0xffffffff8124510b <+9>: push %r12
0xffffffff8124510d <+11>: mov %rsi,%r12
0xffffffff81245110 <+14>: push %rbx
0xffffffff81245111 <+15>: mov %rdi,%rbx
0xffffffff81245114 <+18>: lea 0x10(%rdi),%rdi
0xffffffff81245118 <+22>: callq 0xffffffff812450df <nlmclnt_next_cookie>
0xffffffff8124511d <+27>: mov 0x60(%r12),%rdx
0xffffffff81245122 <+32>: lea 0x44(%rbx),%rax
0xffffffff81245126 <+36>: mov %rax,%rdi
0xffffffff81245129 <+39>: mov $0x82,%ecx
0xffffffff8124512e <+44>: mov %gs:0xb8c0,%rax
0xffffffff81245137 <+53>: mov 0x20(%rdx),%rsi
0xffffffff8124513b <+57>: sub $0x1c0,%rsi
0xffffffff81245142 <+64>: rep movsb %ds:(%rsi),%es:(%rdi)
0xffffffff81245144 <+66>: lea 0x354(%rbx),%rdi
0xffffffff8124514b <+73>: mov $0x4a,%esi
0xffffffff81245150 <+78>: mov 0x568(%rax),%rdx
-> 0xffffffff81245157 <+85>: mov 0x8(%rdx),%rdx
0xffffffff8124515b <+89>: mov %rdi,0xd0(%rbx)
0xffffffff81245162 <+96>: add $0x45,%rdx
(aside: wish GDB reported those offsets in hex, or the kernel reported
them in decimal. Every time I look at these I forget to convert and get
confused...)
I wonder if req is NULL (possible if the assignment to argp at the top
of the function's been pushed down by the optimizer). Time to stick a
printk() in and find out (after work is over so I can reboot this box
like billy-o).
--
NULL && (void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists