[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1375728583.22073.118.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:49:43 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, gcc <gcc@....gnu.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 11:29 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Traps nest, that's why there is a stack. (OK, so you don't want to take
> the same trap inside the trap handler, but that code should be very
> limited.) The trap instruction just becomes very short, but rather
> slow, call-return.
>
> However, when you consider the cost you have to consider that the
> tracepoint is doing other work, so it may very well amortize out.
Also, how would you pass the parameters? Every tracepoint has its own
parameters to pass to it. How would a trap know what where to get "prev"
and "next"?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists