linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] RFC: perf, tools: Move gtk browser into separate perfgtk executable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 05 Aug 2013 12:10:34 -0700
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	acme@...radead.org, Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: perf, tools: Move gtk browser into separate perfgtk executable

Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> writes:
>
> I wrote a patch series [1] separating gtk code to a dso and use it with
> libdl last year.  But I didn't get much feedback probably due to the
> mistake of not installing the dso to a proper place.  It'd be great if
> you guys take a look at it and give some comments.

It looks good as a replacement of this patch

Except for the requirement to build libperf as -fPIC
In some setups the PIC penalty can be high, and libperf
has some very hot code (e.g. callstack merging)

-Andi
-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/