[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1375730199.22073.135.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:16:39 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, gcc <gcc@....gnu.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 12:04 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> writes:
>
> Can't you just use -freorder-blocks-and-partition?
Yeah, I'm familiar with this option.
>
> This should already partition unlikely blocks into a
> different section. Just a single one of course.
>
> FWIW the disadvantage is that multiple code sections tends
> to break various older dwarf unwinders, as it needs
> dwarf3 latest'n'greatest.
If the option was so good, I would expect everyone would be using it ;-)
I'm mainly only concerned with the tracepoints. I'm asking to be able to
do this with just the tracepoint code, and affect nobody else.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists