linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-3.12] cgroup: make css_for_each_descendant() and friends include the origin css in the iteration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51FF2560.8020206@huawei.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Aug 2013 12:09:04 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
	Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	<containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-3.12] cgroup: make css_for_each_descendant()
 and friends include the origin css in the iteration

> Previously, all css descendant iterators didn't include the origin
> (root of subtree) css in the iteration.  The reasons were maintaining
> consistency with css_for_each_child() and that at the time of
> introduction more use cases needed skipping the origin anyway;
> however, given that css_is_descendant() considers self to be a
> descendant, omitting the origin css has become more confusing and
> looking at the accumulated use cases rather clearly indicates that
> including origin would result in simpler code overall.
> 
> While this is a change which can easily lead to subtle bugs, cgroup
> API including the iterators has recently gone through major
> restructuring and no out-of-tree changes will be applicable without
> adjustments making this a relatively acceptable opportunity for this
> type of change.
> 
> The conversions are mostly straight-forward.  If the iteration block
> had explicit origin handling before or after, it's moved inside the
> iteration.  If not, if (pos == origin) continue; is added.  Some
> conversions add extra reference get/put around origin handling by
> consolidating origin handling and the rest.  While the extra ref
> operations aren't strictly necessary, this shouldn't cause any
> noticeable difference.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
> Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
> Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>

I was wondering this would be better when I converted cgroup_cfts_commits()
to use this iterator.

Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/