[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130806114101.20643.46837.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 17:11:01 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: <gleb@...hat.com>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <jeremy@...p.org>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, <habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<mtosatti@...hat.com>, <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
<andi@...stfloor.org>, <attilio.rao@...rix.com>,
<ouyang@...pitt.edu>, <gregkh@...e.de>, <agraf@...e.de>,
<chegu_vinod@...com>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<avi.kivity@...il.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<riel@...hat.com>, <drjones@...hat.com>,
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH V12 2/14] x86/ticketlock: Don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks
x86/ticketlock: Don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
The code size expands somewhat, and its better to just call
a function rather than inline it.
Thanks Jeremy for original version of ARCH_NOINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK config patch,
which is simplified.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 7f3867c..724ce55 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -663,6 +663,7 @@ config PARAVIRT_DEBUG
config PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
bool "Paravirtualization layer for spinlocks"
depends on PARAVIRT && SMP
+ select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
---help---
Paravirtualized spinlocks allow a pvops backend to replace the
spinlock implementation with something virtualization-friendly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists