| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <1375794314.13955.6.camel@AMDC1943> Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:05:14 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com> To: Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm: reclaim zbud pages on migration and compaction On wto, 2013-08-06 at 17:16 +0800, Bob Liu wrote: > On 08/06/2013 02:42 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > This reclaim process is different than zbud_reclaim_page(). It acts more > > like swapoff() by trying to unuse pages stored in zbud page and bring > > them back to memory. The standard zbud_reclaim_page() on the other hand > > tries to write them back. > > I prefer to migrate zbud pages directly if it's possible than reclaiming > them during compaction. I think it is possible however it would be definitely more complex. In case of migration the zswap handles should be updated as they are just virtual addresses. Am I right? Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists