linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf tools: Add support for pinned modifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130806140221.GD1068@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:02:21 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...stprotocols.net,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf tools: Add support for pinned modifier

On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:28:05PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> This commit adds support for a new modifier "D", which requests that the
> event, or group of events, be pinned to the PMU.
> 
> The "p" modifier is already taken for precise, and "P" may be used in
> future to mean "fully precise".
> 
> So we use "D", which stands for pinneD - and looks like a padlock, or if
> you're using the ":D" syntax perf smiles at you.
> 
> This is an oft-requested feature from our HW folks, who want to be able
> to run a large number of events, but also want 100% accurate results for
> instructions per cycle.
> 
> Comparison of results with and without pinning:
> 
> $ perf stat -e '{cycles,instructions}:D' -e cycles,instructions,...
> 
>   79,590,480,683 cycles         #  0.000 GHz
>  166,123,716,524 instructions   #  2.09  insns per cycle
>                                 #  0.11  stalled cycles per insn
> 
>   79,352,134,463 cycles         #  0.000 GHz                     [11.11%]
>  165,178,301,818 instructions   #  2.08  insns per cycle
>                                 #  0.11  stalled cycles per insn [11.13%]
> 
> As you can see although perf does a very good job of scaling the values
> in the non-pinned case, there is some small discrepancy.
> 
> The patch is fairly straight forward, the one detail is that we need to
> make sure we only request pinning for the group leader when we have a
> group.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>

Tested-by/Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>

thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/