[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1375806413.25420.36.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 12:26:53 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, gcc <gcc@....gnu.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 09:19 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 09:15 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 14:43 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> >> For unconditional jmp that should be pretty safe barring any fundamental
> >> changes to the instruction set, in which case we can enable it as
> >> needed, but for extra robustness it probably should skip prefix bytes.
> >
> > Would the assembler add prefix bytes to:
> >
> > jmp 1f
> >
>
> No, but if we ever end up doing MPX in the kernel, for example, we would
> have to put an MPX prefix on the jmp.
Well then we just have to update the rest of the jump label code :-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists