lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo57cmg2ynLLLZw0yXH5Q1B0MZBdqSgFXUu2NpS=8W6Y2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 Aug 2013 11:48:04 -0600
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
Cc:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>,
	adam radford <aradford@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tile: support LSI MEGARAID SAS HBA hybrid dma_ops

[+cc Myron, Adam]

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com> wrote:
> The LSI MEGARAID SAS HBA suffers from the problem where it can do
> 64-bit DMA to streaming buffers but not to consistent buffers.
> In other words, 64-bit DMA is used for disk data transfers and 32-bit
> DMA must be used for control message transfers.

Is this related at all to the make_local_pdev() hacks in megaraid.c?
The intent there seems to be to use a 32-bit DMA mask for certain
transactions and a 64-bit mask for others.  But I think it's actually
broken, because the implementation changes the mask to 32-bit for
*all* future transactions, not just the one using make_local_pdev().

> According to LSI,
> the firmware is not fully functional yet. This change implements a
> kind of hybrid dma_ops to support this.
>
> Note that on most other platforms, the 64-bit DMA addressing space is the
> same as the 32-bit DMA space and they overlap the physical memory space.
> No special arrangement is needed to support this kind of mixed DMA
> capability.  On TILE-Gx, the 64-bit DMA space is completely separate
> from the 32-bit DMA space.

Help me understand what's going on here.  My understanding is that on
typical systems, the 32-bit DMA space is a subset of the 64-bit DMA
space.  In conventional PCI, "a master that supports 64-bit addressing
must generate a SAC, instead of a DAC, when the upper 32 bits of the
address are zero" (PCI spec r3.0, sec 3.9).  PCIe doesn't have
SAC/DAC, but it has both 32-bit and 64-bit address headers and has a
similar requirement: "For Addresses below 4GB, Requesters must use the
32-bit format" (PCIe spec r3.0, sec 2.2.4.1).

Those imply to me that the 0-4GB region of the 64-bit DMA space must
be identical to the 0-4GB 32-bit DMA space, and in fact, the receiver
of a transaction shouldn't be able to distinguish them.

But it sounds like something's different on TILE-Gx?  Does it
translate bus addresses to physical memory addresses based on the type
of the transaction (SAC vs DAC, or 32-bit vs 64-bit header) in
addition to the address?  Even if it does, the spec doesn't allow a
DAC cycle or a 64-bit header where the 32 high-order bits are zero, so
it shouldn't matter.

Bjorn

>  Due to the use of the IOMMU, the 64-bit DMA
> space doesn't overlap the physical memory space.  On the other hand,
> the 32-bit DMA space overlaps the physical memory space under 4GB.
> The separate address spaces make it necessary to have separate dma_ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
> ---
>  arch/tile/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 10 +++++++---
>  arch/tile/kernel/pci-dma.c          | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/tile/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/tile/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> index f2ff191..4a60059 100644
> --- a/arch/tile/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/arch/tile/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  extern struct dma_map_ops *tile_dma_map_ops;
>  extern struct dma_map_ops *gx_pci_dma_map_ops;
>  extern struct dma_map_ops *gx_legacy_pci_dma_map_ops;
> +extern struct dma_map_ops *gx_hybrid_pci_dma_map_ops;
>
>  static inline struct dma_map_ops *get_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
>  {
> @@ -44,12 +45,12 @@ static inline void set_dma_offset(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t off)
>
>  static inline dma_addr_t phys_to_dma(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr)
>  {
> -       return paddr + get_dma_offset(dev);
> +       return paddr;
>  }
>
>  static inline phys_addr_t dma_to_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t daddr)
>  {
> -       return daddr - get_dma_offset(dev);
> +       return daddr;
>  }
>
>  static inline void dma_mark_clean(void *addr, size_t size) {}
> @@ -88,7 +89,10 @@ dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>         struct dma_map_ops *dma_ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
>
>         /* Handle legacy PCI devices with limited memory addressability. */
> -       if ((dma_ops == gx_pci_dma_map_ops) && (mask <= DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
> +       if ((dma_ops == gx_pci_dma_map_ops ||
> +            dma_ops == gx_hybrid_pci_dma_map_ops ||
> +            dma_ops == gx_legacy_pci_dma_map_ops) &&
> +           (mask <= DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
>                 set_dma_ops(dev, gx_legacy_pci_dma_map_ops);
>                 set_dma_offset(dev, 0);
>                 if (mask > dev->archdata.max_direct_dma_addr)
> diff --git a/arch/tile/kernel/pci-dma.c b/arch/tile/kernel/pci-dma.c
> index b9fe80e..7e22e73 100644
> --- a/arch/tile/kernel/pci-dma.c
> +++ b/arch/tile/kernel/pci-dma.c
> @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static void *tile_pci_dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>
>         addr = page_to_phys(pg);
>
> -       *dma_handle = phys_to_dma(dev, addr);
> +       *dma_handle = addr + get_dma_offset(dev);
>
>         return page_address(pg);
>  }
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int tile_pci_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sglist,
>                 sg->dma_address = sg_phys(sg);
>                 __dma_prep_pa_range(sg->dma_address, sg->length, direction);
>
> -               sg->dma_address = phys_to_dma(dev, sg->dma_address);
> +               sg->dma_address = sg->dma_address + get_dma_offset(dev);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH
>                 sg->dma_length = sg->length;
>  #endif
> @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ static dma_addr_t tile_pci_dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
>         BUG_ON(offset + size > PAGE_SIZE);
>         __dma_prep_page(page, offset, size, direction);
>
> -       return phys_to_dma(dev, page_to_pa(page) + offset);
> +       return page_to_pa(page) + offset + get_dma_offset(dev);
>  }
>
>  static void tile_pci_dma_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_address,
> @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static void tile_pci_dma_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_address,
>  {
>         BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(direction));
>
> -       dma_address = dma_to_phys(dev, dma_address);
> +       dma_address -= get_dma_offset(dev);
>
>         __dma_complete_page(pfn_to_page(PFN_DOWN(dma_address)),
>                             dma_address & PAGE_OFFSET, size, direction);
> @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static void tile_pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *dev,
>  {
>         BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(direction));
>
> -       dma_handle = dma_to_phys(dev, dma_handle);
> +       dma_handle -= get_dma_offset(dev);
>
>         __dma_complete_pa_range(dma_handle, size, direction);
>  }
> @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ static void tile_pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev,
>                                                 enum dma_data_direction
>                                                 direction)
>  {
> -       dma_handle = dma_to_phys(dev, dma_handle);
> +       dma_handle -= get_dma_offset(dev);
>
>         __dma_prep_pa_range(dma_handle, size, direction);
>  }
> @@ -558,21 +558,43 @@ static struct dma_map_ops pci_swiotlb_dma_ops = {
>         .mapping_error = swiotlb_dma_mapping_error,
>  };
>
> +static struct dma_map_ops pci_hybrid_dma_ops = {
> +       .alloc = tile_swiotlb_alloc_coherent,
> +       .free = tile_swiotlb_free_coherent,
> +       .map_page = tile_pci_dma_map_page,
> +       .unmap_page = tile_pci_dma_unmap_page,
> +       .map_sg = tile_pci_dma_map_sg,
> +       .unmap_sg = tile_pci_dma_unmap_sg,
> +       .sync_single_for_cpu = tile_pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu,
> +       .sync_single_for_device = tile_pci_dma_sync_single_for_device,
> +       .sync_sg_for_cpu = tile_pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu,
> +       .sync_sg_for_device = tile_pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device,
> +       .mapping_error = tile_pci_dma_mapping_error,
> +       .dma_supported = tile_pci_dma_supported
> +};
> +
>  struct dma_map_ops *gx_legacy_pci_dma_map_ops = &pci_swiotlb_dma_ops;
> +struct dma_map_ops *gx_hybrid_pci_dma_map_ops = &pci_hybrid_dma_ops;
>  #else
>  struct dma_map_ops *gx_legacy_pci_dma_map_ops;
> +struct dma_map_ops *gx_hybrid_pci_dma_map_ops;
>  #endif
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(gx_legacy_pci_dma_map_ops);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(gx_hybrid_pci_dma_map_ops);
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_COHERENT_MASK
>  int dma_set_coherent_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>  {
>         struct dma_map_ops *dma_ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
>
> -       /* Handle legacy PCI devices with limited memory addressability. */
> -       if (((dma_ops == gx_pci_dma_map_ops) ||
> -           (dma_ops == gx_legacy_pci_dma_map_ops)) &&
> +       /* Handle hybrid PCI devices with limited memory addressability. */
> +       if ((dma_ops == gx_pci_dma_map_ops ||
> +            dma_ops == gx_hybrid_pci_dma_map_ops ||
> +            dma_ops == gx_legacy_pci_dma_map_ops) &&
>             (mask <= DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
> +               if (dma_ops == gx_pci_dma_map_ops)
> +                       set_dma_ops(dev, gx_hybrid_pci_dma_map_ops);
> +
>                 if (mask > dev->archdata.max_direct_dma_addr)
>                         mask = dev->archdata.max_direct_dma_addr;
>         }
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ