[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130806141603.948961cecfc9426aeee7c083@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:16:03 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>,
Jim Hull <jim.hull@...com>, Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] partitions/efi: detect hybrid mbrs
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 22:21:08 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com> wrote:
> This patchset teaches the kernel about hybrid master boot records (MBRs), one of
> the most common issues with GUID partition tables, as a workaround to layout
> disk partitions to be compatible with both EFI and legacy MBR based systems.
> Except for adding more pmbr checks, to better comply with the UEFI/GPT specs, the
> functionality is left unchanged - we only inform (through debug) the user about
> the used MBR scheme. While it is true that these restrictions can be bypassed when
> forcing gpt, this is not the correct or default way of doing things, complicating
> users furthermore. More details are in the individual patches.
Patches look nice, although I'll cheerily admit to not having a clue
what they do. What is a "hybrid MBR" anyway?
Someone's editor seems to replace tabs with spaces so the patches
generate quite a checkpatch storm. Please use checkpatch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists