linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] mmc: dw_mmc: Add suspend_noirq/resume_noirq callbacks for dw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:32:23 -0700
From:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:	Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
Cc:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
	Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] mmc: dw_mmc: Add suspend_noirq/resume_noirq
 callbacks for dw_mmc-pltfm

Seungwon Jeon,

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com> wrote:
> On Thu, July 11, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> On some devices (like exynos5420) the dw_mmc controller may be in a
>> strange state after we wake up from sleep.  Add callbacks to allow for
>> dealing with these quirks.  We use the "_noirq" versions of the
>> callbacks since in the case of exynos5420 the strange state caused
>> interrupts to fire so we need to deal with it while interrupts are
>> still off.
>>
>> At the moment this support is only added to dw_mmc-pltfm which calls
>> straight to the callback, since nobody but exynos needs it.  We can
>> add some levels of indirection (a call into the generic dw_mmc code)
>> when someone finds a need.
> I think It would be better to add _noirq only to dw_mmc-exynos.
> That is we can add dev_pm_ops for dw_mmc-exynos's own.
> As you recognize, there is no common routine which is not introduced for dw_mmc xxx_noirq now.
> I feel like it is for handling quirk.
> If we meet use case for that in some day, it could be added commonly.
> How do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> Seungwon Jeon

Sorry for the long delay in responding.

I originally didn't do what you proposed since dw_mmc-exynos uses the
dw_mci_pltfm_pmops directly.  ...but I agree that it is cleaner, so
I've switched the code to do as you say.  New patch coming shortly.
Thank you for your review.

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/