[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1375827089.2424.37.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:11:29 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, xi.wang@...il.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl_binary.c: improve the usage of return
value 'result'
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 14:43 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:29:42 +0800 Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com> wrote:
>
> > Improve the usage of return value 'result', so not only can make code
> > clearer to readers, but also can improve the performance.
>
> It used to be pervasive kernel style do to
>
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> foo = alloc(...);
> if (!foo)
> goto out;
>
> whereas nowadays people usually do the more straightforward
>
> foo = alloc(...);
> if (!foo) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto out;
> }
>
> The thinking was that the old style generated better code, but for the
> life of me I can't remember why :(
https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/16/383
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists