lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1375827089.2424.37.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:11:29 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, xi.wang@...il.com,
	nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl_binary.c: improve the usage of return
 value 'result'

On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 14:43 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:29:42 +0800 Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com> wrote:
> 
> > Improve the usage of return value 'result', so not only can make code
> > clearer to readers, but also can improve the performance.
> 
> It used to be pervasive kernel style do to
> 
> 	ret = -ENOMEM;
> 	foo = alloc(...);
> 	if (!foo)
> 		goto out;
> 
> whereas nowadays people usually do the more straightforward
> 
> 	foo = alloc(...);
> 	if (!foo) {
> 		ret = -ENOMEM;
> 		goto out;
> 	}
> 
> The thinking was that the old style generated better code, but for the
> life of me I can't remember why :(

https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/16/383


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ