linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mmc: dw_mmc: Add exynos resume_noirq callback to clear WAKEUP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4664300.eCYx009QLm@flatron>
Date:	Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:20:19 +0200
From:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
	Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>,
	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
	Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@...sung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mmc: dw_mmc: Add exynos resume_noirq callback to clear WAKEUP_INT

On Tuesday 06 of August 2013 15:09:46 Doug Anderson wrote:
> Tomasz,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com> 
wrote:
> >> +static int dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> >> +{
> >> +     struct dw_mci *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >> +     u32 clksel;
> >> +
> >> +     clksel = mci_readl(host, CLKSEL);
> >> +     if (clksel & SDMMC_CLKSEL_WAKEUP_INT)
> >> +             mci_writel(host, CLKSEL, clksel);
> > 
> > What about clock gating? Will the clock used for clocking this
> > register be always enabled when this gets called?
> 
> Since this is just accessing and writing a register in the "Mobile
> Storage Host" block, I'd imagine that this should be the "biu" (bus
> interface unit) clock, right?  The dw_mmc code grabs the biu clock at
> probe time and never lets it go.  That means that we're OK as long as
> common clock framework has already restored clocks to normal operation
> by this time.
> 
> Do you think that common clock framework might not have put the clocks
> back into order by the time "noirq" callbacks are executed?

Ahh, so the dw_mmc driver doesn't do any clock gating? This is not very 
nice of it.

Well, in this case your patch is OK, but possibly some clock gating will 
have to be added to this driver at some point of time. Anyway:

Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>

Best regards,
Tomasz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/