[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130806064201.GR19750@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 08:42:01 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use gcc alias instead of assembler aliases for syscalls
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:59:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:09:35 -0700 Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Use standard gcc __attribute__((alias(foo))) to define
> > the syscall aliases instead of custom assembler macros.
> >
> > This is far cleaner, and also fixes my LTO kernel build.
>
> I wonder what gcc version this was added in. Seems fairly longstanding.
Seems to be already in 2.95, so every kernel compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-2.95.3/gcc_4.html#SEC90
>
> > { \
> > return C_SYSC##name(__MAP(x,__SC_DELOUSE,__VA_ARGS__)); \
> > } \
> > - SYSCALL_ALIAS(compat_sys##name, compat_SyS##name); \
>
> I think we can remove the SYSCALL_ALIAS definitions?
Yes will send a followon patch.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists