[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1375860442.896960598@f427.i.mail.ru>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 11:27:22 +0400
From: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
To: Wei Ni <wni@...dia.com>
Cc: khali@...ux-fr.org, swarren@...dotorg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
MLongnecker@...dia.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwmon: (lm90) Add power control
> The device lm90 can be controlled by the vdd rail.
> Adding the power control support to power on/off the vdd rail.
> And make sure that power is enabled before accessing the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
[...]
> + if (!data->lm90_reg) {
> + data->lm90_reg = regulator_get(&client->dev, "vdd");
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->lm90_reg)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg) == -ENODEV)
> + dev_info(&client->dev,
> + "No regulator found for vdd. Assuming vdd is always powered.");
> + else
> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
> + "Error [%ld] in getting the regulator handle for vdd.\n",
> + PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg));
> + data->lm90_reg = NULL;
> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + }
> + if (is_enable) {
> + ret = regulator_enable(data->lm90_reg);
> + msleep(POWER_ON_DELAY);
Can this delay be handled directly from regulator?
[...]
---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists