[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5201FB2A.2010806@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:45:46 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
CC: Wei Ni <wni@...dia.com>, khali@...ux-fr.org, swarren@...dotorg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
MLongnecker@...dia.com, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwmon: (lm90) Add power control
On 08/07/2013 12:27 AM, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
>> The device lm90 can be controlled by the vdd rail.
>> Adding the power control support to power on/off the vdd rail.
>> And make sure that power is enabled before accessing the device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> [...]
>> + if (!data->lm90_reg) {
>> + data->lm90_reg = regulator_get(&client->dev, "vdd");
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->lm90_reg)) {
>> + if (PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg) == -ENODEV)
>> + dev_info(&client->dev,
>> + "No regulator found for vdd. Assuming vdd is always powered.");
>> + else
>> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
>> + "Error [%ld] in getting the regulator handle for vdd.\n",
>> + PTR_ERR(data->lm90_reg));
>> + data->lm90_reg = NULL;
>> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (is_enable) {
>> + ret = regulator_enable(data->lm90_reg);
>> + msleep(POWER_ON_DELAY);
>
> Can this delay be handled directly from regulator?
>
Good question. Browsing through other regulator_enable calls,
I don't see a similar delay anywhere else, so one should assume
that this is not necessary.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists