[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5201BDB9.8050301@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 12:23:37 +0900
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
CC: <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI, cpu hotplug: move try_offline_node() after acpi_unmap_lsapic()
(2013/08/07 1:56), Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
>> try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
>> removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
>> been removed, try_offline_node() clears the node information.
>>
>> But try_offline_node() called from acpi_processor_remove() never clears
>> the node information. For disabling cpu_present_bits, acpi_unmap_lsapic()
>> need be called. But acpi_unmap_lsapic() is called after try_offline_node()
>> runs. So when try_offline_node() runs, the cpu's cpu_present_bits is always
>> set.
>>
>> This patch moves try_offline_node() after acpi_unmap_lsapic().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>
> The change looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Thanks, Toshi!
> BTW, do you know why try_offline_node() has to use stop_machine()?
I don't know the reason.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
> Thanks,
> -Toshi
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists