[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52026C66.2080509@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 10:48:54 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>, <patches@...aro.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: OPP: rename functions? (was [PATCH] OPP: Export opp_add())
Rafael,
offline question:
On 08/06/2013 09:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 08:08:20 AM Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> change in subject to reflect new discussion.
>>
>> On 05:53-20130806, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 08/03/2013 02:25 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(opp_add);
>>>
>>> Could it be renamed to pm_opp_add() or power_opp_add() ?
>>> The name is a bit too unspecific IMO.
>> Though this has nothing specific with this patch, an interesting point.
>>
>> git grep -w opp . showed drivers/tty/n_tty.c,
>> drivers/sbus/char/openprom.c and arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c using
>> variables named opp to mean what ever they had in context. rest(around
>> 40 odd files) seem to use opp as in Documentation/power/opp.txt..
>>
>> We could go with a pm_ prefix or even dev_pm_opp_ prefix to be more
>> specific, though I prefer just pm_. If Rafael and others are ok, I can
>> post a series out.
>
> Yup, that would be useful. I'm for dev_pm_opp_ if that matters.
Given that there would be quiet a few conflicts, do you have a
suggestion around what baseline I should submit this?
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists