[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1375896786.6848.14.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 13:33:06 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/jump-label: Show where and what was wrong on
errors
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 19:20 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> > +static void bug_at(unsigned char *ip, int line)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * The location is not an op that we were expecting.
> > + * Something went wrong. Crash the box, as something could be
> > + * corrupting the kernel.
> > + */
> > + pr_warning("Unexpected op at %pS [%p] (%02x %02x %02x %02x %02x) %s:%d\n",
> > + ip, ip, ip[0], ip[1], ip[2], ip[3], ip[4], __FILE__, line);
> > + BUG();
>
> Why not simply
>
> panic("Unexpected...")
>
> ?
Because the patch replaced BUG().
>
> Besides, BUG can be disabled in CONFIG_EXPERT.
>
Right, and this code keeps the same logic as it was before. If it was
disabled by CONFIG_EXPERT, it stays disabled, but at least you get to
see a warning that your kernel may be corrupt now :-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists