[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130807.104713.1615549684239408926.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 10:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: johannes@...solutions.net, phil@....cc, sedat.dilek@...il.com,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
hannes@...essinduktion.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linville@...driver.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 09:40:09 -0700
> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 18:22 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
>> Maybe. I haven't tested it, but I'm thinking that skb->data doesn't
>> point to the start of the data frame in this case, since we now call
>> eth_type_trans() which pulls the ethernet header. So if the device just
>> transmits skb->len starting from skb->data, it'll be wrong, no? That
>> seems a basic assumption though.
>
> Yes, it seems calling eth_type_trans() is not right here, and even could
> crash.
>
> Sorry, for being vague, I am a bit busy this morning.
Yes, this is absolutely the core problem, you absolute cannot
call eth_type_trans() on the output path, it pulls off the
ethernet header from the packet. That can't possibly work.
I want a real fix submitted formally for this problem immediately,
or else I'm reverting all of these changes this afternoon.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists