[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5202892F.7010804@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 10:51:43 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/jump-label: Show where and what was wrong on
errors
On 08/07/2013 10:46 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 19:37 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 01:33:06PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> Right, and this code keeps the same logic as it was before. If it was
>>> disabled by CONFIG_EXPERT, it stays disabled, but at least you get to
>>> see a warning that your kernel may be corrupt now :-)
>>
>> Don't we really want to panic instead of running a corrupt kernel? IOW,
>> to change the logic to panic unconditionally because the image in memory
>> has been violated and not in a good way, at that :-)
>
> Well, there's lots of places that use BUG() for a corrupt kernel. If you
> are stupid enough to disable it, you get what you asked for.
>
A bigger issue is probably if panic-on-bug should be the default, with
!panic being an opt-in debugging option.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists