[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpo=MpOyMGFTGeZWmoCRwmZ7+nQtP_yCGokPanEVYL0xbMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 23:36:52 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, swarren@...dia.com, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
patches@...aro.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mturquette@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: Tegra: Add CPU's OPPs for using cpufreq-cpu0 driver
On 7 August 2013 23:12, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
> On 08/07/2013 08:46 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> cpufreq-cpu0 driver needs OPPs to be present in DT which can be probed by it to
>> get frequency table. This patch adds OPPs and clock-latency to tegra cpu0 node
>> for multiple SoCs.
>>
>> Voltage levels aren't used until now for tegra and so a flat value which would
>> eventually be ignored is used to represent voltage.
>
> This patch is problematic w.r.t. DT being an ABI.
:(
> We can certainly add new optional properties to a DT binding that enable
> new features. However, a new version of a binding can't require new
> properties to exist that didn't before, since that means that old DTs
> won't work with new kernels that require the new properties.
To be honest I didn't get it completely. You meant operating-points
wasn't present before? Its here:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/opp.txt
Or you meant, Tegra never required voltage levels and we are getting
them in here.
> As such, I believe we do need some Tegra-specific piece of code that
> defines these OPP tables in the kernel, so that the operating-points
> property is not needed.
Generic cpufreq driver depends on OPP library and so somebody has
to provide them. Now you can do it by calling opp_add() for each OPP
you have or otherwise.
Btw, you must have some specific voltage level for each freq, we can
get them here..
> Similarly, we can't put invalid voltages into the DT, since if a later
> kernel version starts actually using that field, the HW will no longer
> work correctly. Unless perhaps we put 0 into the DT and make the binding
> define that 0 means "you can't change the voltage at all away from the
> boot value"?
Hmm.. so if you help me in getting actual voltage levels for these freqs
then this problem will be resolved. Otherwise I can check what will happen
if we pass zero to voltage.
> Is the operating-points property documented in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ somewhere?
Check above.
> (Also Cc'ing the DT mailing list and maintainers)
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists